Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Micah's avatar

Excellent advice. I truly enjoy when GMs lean into my out of the box thinking for solutions to puzzling scenarios. Plus it’s a rewarding feeling when they work. I will be doing by best to implement this mentally in a session this week.

Expand full comment
Rodney's avatar

I would say that the author here is plainly not a pedant.

I unfortunately am. As proof, I am pretty sure that any prep I do has at least an implied, if not actual, "If the party ...".

"If the party opens this door in the dungeon ..."

"If the party continues along the road they are on ..."

"If the party seeks further information about ..."

"If the party journeys to the next village (as they said they would, but do change their minds from session to session) ...

So, as written, this advice to a pedant would pretty much mean: avoid all prep.

So, the issue for me is not to avoid "If the party ..." all together, but rather is at what scale do we stop considering further branches. This question has (obviously) not been explicitly addressed, but the suggestion seems to be "once you have outlined a scenario, challenge or problem to be overcome."

I would appreciate your thoughts, both on whether you agree with my analysis, and also on what defines the point at which you stop branching in your prep.

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts